Are 100% code coverage reasonable?
When you use a code coverage tool one of the first question is what is a good code coverage. Recently I listened to different podcasts (stackoverflow, scott hanselman) where they discuss this topic. I wasn’t really surprised that there wasn’t one unique opinion.One opinion was that 100% is a good number, an other opinion was that for non-failing code it doesn’t make sense to build a test, so 100% isn’t a good number for most of the projects.The last opinion…