<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From NUnit to MSTest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.eweibel.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303</link>
	<description>Blog about software architecture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:28:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Tobler</title>
		<link>http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303&#038;cpage=1#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tobler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303#comment-702</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-109&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Andy &lt;/a&gt; 
The TestDriven.net client used to be free but is now a commercial product.  Resharper is a commercial product, also.   I just want to make it clear that neither of these are Open Source or &quot;free as in beer.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-109" rel="nofollow">@Andy </a><br />
The TestDriven.net client used to be free but is now a commercial product.  Resharper is a commercial product, also.   I just want to make it clear that neither of these are Open Source or &#8220;free as in beer.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303&#038;cpage=1#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303#comment-146</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-145&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Ian Chamberlain &lt;/a&gt; 
Hi Ian

I agree with you that NUnit has more features than MSTest (see my point about the assertion methods), so NUnit stays my favorite Unit-Test framework in the .Net space. And with the #Resharper it is just great to work with. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-145" rel="nofollow">@Ian Chamberlain </a><br />
Hi Ian</p>
<p>I agree with you that NUnit has more features than MSTest (see my point about the assertion methods), so NUnit stays my favorite Unit-Test framework in the .Net space. And with the #Resharper it is just great to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Chamberlain</title>
		<link>http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303&#038;cpage=1#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Chamberlain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303#comment-145</guid>
		<description>NUnit to MSTest is a backwards step.

MSTest has less features, is slow, is buggy and years behind. It is simply too painful to use for TDD.

I feel sorry for you having to take such a retrograde step, especially as you can still use code coverage, etc with NUnit tests via a number of different open source add ons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NUnit to MSTest is a backwards step.</p>
<p>MSTest has less features, is slow, is buggy and years behind. It is simply too painful to use for TDD.</p>
<p>I feel sorry for you having to take such a retrograde step, especially as you can still use code coverage, etc with NUnit tests via a number of different open source add ons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303&#038;cpage=1#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303#comment-111</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-105&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Daniel Fisher(lennybacon) &lt;/a&gt; 
Thank you for your comment and for the answer on stackoverflow.com. I checked your answer as correct, so other user could use your approach to test several test assemblies at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-105" rel="nofollow">@Daniel Fisher(lennybacon) </a><br />
Thank you for your comment and for the answer on stackoverflow.com. I checked your answer as correct, so other user could use your approach to test several test assemblies at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by jrguay</title>
		<link>http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303&#038;cpage=1#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by jrguay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303#comment-110</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by jrguay [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by jrguay [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303&#038;cpage=1#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303#comment-109</guid>
		<description>In NUnit you can do this, which is even better in my opinion:

Assert.That(nCount, Is.GreaterThan(5));

You can also get NUnit code coverage and integration in VS with TestDriven.net if you don&#039;t have R#. So no real need to migrate at all in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In NUnit you can do this, which is even better in my opinion:</p>
<p>Assert.That(nCount, Is.GreaterThan(5));</p>
<p>You can also get NUnit code coverage and integration in VS with TestDriven.net if you don&#8217;t have R#. So no real need to migrate at all in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hadlow</title>
		<link>http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303&#038;cpage=1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hadlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303#comment-107</guid>
		<description>There are serious problems with MSTest. Before deciding to move from NUnit you should check out Preet Sangha&#039;s blog. He&#039;s done a great job of documenting many fustrations and work-arounds:
http://preetsangha.blogspot.com/

Also my post &#039;MSTest is sapping my will to live&#039;
http://mikehadlow.blogspot.com/2008/07/mstest-is-sapping-my-will-to-live.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are serious problems with MSTest. Before deciding to move from NUnit you should check out Preet Sangha&#8217;s blog. He&#8217;s done a great job of documenting many fustrations and work-arounds:<br />
<a href="http://preetsangha.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://preetsangha.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Also my post &#8216;MSTest is sapping my will to live&#8217;<br />
<a href="http://mikehadlow.blogspot.com/2008/07/mstest-is-sapping-my-will-to-live.html" rel="nofollow">http://mikehadlow.blogspot.com/2008/07/mstest-is-sapping-my-will-to-live.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Fisher(lennybacon)</title>
		<link>http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303&#038;cpage=1#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fisher(lennybacon)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303#comment-105</guid>
		<description>You can use MSBuild to execute a &quot;MSTest-Task&quot;...
Have a look here: http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/ndobkin/archive/2007/12/16/mstest-task-for-msbuild.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can use MSBuild to execute a &#8220;MSTest-Task&#8221;&#8230;<br />
Have a look here: <a href="http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/ndobkin/archive/2007/12/16/mstest-task-for-msbuild.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/ndobkin/archive/2007/12/16/mstest-task-for-msbuild.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock &#187; The Morning Brew #381</title>
		<link>http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303&#038;cpage=1#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock &#187; The Morning Brew #381</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eweibel.net/?p=303#comment-104</guid>
		<description>[...] From NUnit to MSTest - Patrick Weibel looks at the differences between these two testing frameworks as a part of the process of moving from NUnit to MSTest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From NUnit to MSTest &#8211; Patrick Weibel looks at the differences between these two testing frameworks as a part of the process of moving from NUnit to MSTest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
